FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
Forum rules
- Read the rule stickies, especially ***** FORUM RULES • PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING HERE! *****, before you post.
- If you are thinking about running from git, please do the entire community a favor and read this thread first. It contains some important information that anyone thinking about running from git should be familiar with.
Gah.
- OzzyOzrock
- Member
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: December 11th, 2008
- Reputation: 0
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
It takes insanely long to move all my stuf lol.
I haven't touched a GH related game for 6 months. Woo. My (dead) song thread: Contains horrible things.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: August 16th, 2008
- Location: Texas
- Reputation: 15
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
OzzyOzrock wrote:It takes insanely long to move all my stuf lol.
well um you could have deleated all the old 3.100 stuff and copyed over the 3.120 into the folder :P
Developer of clone hero, and Former FoFiX developer
Gah.
- OzzyOzrock
- Member
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: December 11th, 2008
- Reputation: 0
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
weirdpeople wrote:OzzyOzrock wrote:It takes insanely long to move all my stuf lol.
well um you could have deleated all the old 3.100 stuff and copyed over the 3.120 into the folder :P
*facepalm*
Anyways, I can't open the new one. There is no Icon to do so.
WAIT, DO I HAVE TO MOVE THE ICON OVER? That makes sense but... lol.
EDIT: Nope, it's not that.
I haven't touched a GH related game for 6 months. Woo. My (dead) song thread: Contains horrible things.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: August 16th, 2008
- Location: Texas
- Reputation: 15
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
OzzyOzrock wrote:weirdpeople wrote:OzzyOzrock wrote:It takes insanely long to move all my stuf lol.
well um you could have deleated all the old 3.100 stuff and copyed over the 3.120 into the folder :P
*facepalm*
Anyways, I can't open the new one. There is no Icon to do so.
WAIT, DO I HAVE TO MOVE THE ICON OVER? That makes sense but... lol.
EDIT: Nope, it's not that.
Are you on windows? or linux?
if your on linux they arnt going to be releaseing compiled binary anymore.
evilynux wrote:Note to GNU/Linux players: As promised, i'm no longer releasing frozen binaries. As mentioned on the summary page, head to our download section and get the source archive. Then follow instructions found on our RunningUnderGNULinux wiki page.
Developer of clone hero, and Former FoFiX developer
Gah.
- OzzyOzrock
- Member
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: December 11th, 2008
- Reputation: 0
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
Holy f***ing ****, I'm a f***ing idiot.
I got the f***ing linux version ****.
LOL. I suck at life sometimes.
---- EDIT ----
ZOMFG, VOCALS ARE POSSIBLE.
I got the f***ing linux version ****.
LOL. I suck at life sometimes.
---- EDIT ----
ZOMFG, VOCALS ARE POSSIBLE.
I haven't touched a GH related game for 6 months. Woo. My (dead) song thread: Contains horrible things.
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
Italo_Hellboy wrote:now i get this error:
should be fixed in r1894
but it made me aware of another problem, could you please post a full log file with r1894?
please post the log and further errors about the fofix trunk in the FoFiX 4.0.0 Development Thread as this is a problem in the newest trunk version - and not a bug in 3.120
Gah.
- OzzyOzrock
- Member
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: December 11th, 2008
- Reputation: 0
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
Gaaaah. Vocals still suck, but they're at least 15% more possible than before.
Ehh. I like vocals. Fix later on? :D
Ehh. I like vocals. Fix later on? :D
I haven't touched a GH related game for 6 months. Woo. My (dead) song thread: Contains horrible things.
The tux power
- Borisdsp
- Member
- Posts: 287
- Joined: July 23rd, 2008
- Location: España
- Reputation: 0
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
Lysdestic wrote:Is it about time to lock this up?
Seconded, i dont know WTF i am writing here too
Team Meteorito Official Member
FoFiX Dev/Mod Squad
- jstump91
- Member
- Posts: 837
- Joined: September 21st, 2008
- Location: Baltimore, MD (US)
- Reputation: 0
- Contact:
Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread
Very well; topic closed.
If you need support for 3.120 or have questions, post a new thread either in this forum or in Tech Support. Do not post 3.120 support requests in the 4.x development thread. The next major release will be 4.0.0 (which also marks a switch to a much more sane version numbering system). If there are very critical bugs discovered in 3.120 that cannot wait for 4.0.0, we will consider making bugfix 3.12x releases that do not incorporate any new 4.x code, but we are going for 4.0.0 now.
If you need support for 3.120 or have questions, post a new thread either in this forum or in Tech Support. Do not post 3.120 support requests in the 4.x development thread. The next major release will be 4.0.0 (which also marks a switch to a much more sane version numbering system). If there are very critical bugs discovered in 3.120 that cannot wait for 4.0.0, we will consider making bugfix 3.12x releases that do not incorporate any new 4.x code, but we are going for 4.0.0 now.
jstump91, a.k.a. john.stumpo, a.k.a. stump jstump.com | stump's blog | FoFiX development | My own code Can't find a Windows build of the Python module you need? Try my mediafire! Don't say "Python can't do [insert task here]." Python can do anything with the right modules - said modules may just not have been written yet. "Python - why settle for snake oil when you can have the whole snake?" --Mark Jackson Did you search before you posted? Did you read the rules for the subforum you are posting in? |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests