FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Discussion particular to FoFiX, its development, and themes
Forum rules
Blue Heaven!
User avatar
death_au
Member
Posts: 3991
Joined: December 12th, 2007
Location: Australia
Reputation: 7
Contact:

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby death_au » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:36 pm

Qstick wrote:You know if i could go in here and delete every post like this in this "DEVELOPMENT" thread, it would probably take it down to around 10 pages.

...Is that all? :glare:
User avatar
Qstick
Member
Posts: 362
Joined: September 30th, 2008
Location: South Carolina
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby Qstick » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:45 pm

death_au wrote:
Qstick wrote:You know if i could go in here and delete every post like this in this "DEVELOPMENT" thread, it would probably take it down to around 10 pages.

...Is that all? :glare:

i meant his post not yours big guy, and maybe i could get it down to 8 but 11 max :tongue2:
Blue Heaven!
User avatar
death_au
Member
Posts: 3991
Joined: December 12th, 2007
Location: Australia
Reputation: 7
Contact:

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby death_au » Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:04 am

lol, I misread. I thought you said "take it down 10 pages", not take it down to 10 pages. That makes more sense. :tongue: [/offtopic]
Last edited by death_au on Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Godess
User avatar
Blue Murder
Member
Posts: 351
Joined: May 8th, 2007
Location: Doin' weird science
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby Blue Murder » Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:05 am

Hard to explain, but...

If you set your setlist to list/album it'll show a little CD case that revolves around. My question is what must you name the picture file in order to have that cover display and/or what does the size have to be?
Beneath the stains of time
The feelings disappear.
You are someone else,
I am still right here.
(0) <-- The Eye
User avatar
angellinus
Member
Posts: 911
Joined: September 19th, 2008
Location: cavite philippines
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby angellinus » Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:30 am

death_au wrote:lol, I misread. I thought you said "take it down 10 pages", not take it down by 10 pages. That makes more sense. :tongue: [/offtopic]


10 more pages? Hmm...........
Image
Blue Heaven!
User avatar
death_au
Member
Posts: 3991
Joined: December 12th, 2007
Location: Australia
Reputation: 7
Contact:

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby death_au » Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:32 am

there's an option to switch between displaying "labels" and "albums". If albums is selected, the image must be called "album.png" (in the song's folder), or "label.png" for labels.
Juhaz
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: December 27th, 2008
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby Juhaz » Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:58 am

death_au wrote:I never noticed a jump in memory usage, but I never paid that much attention anyway. If someone else can test an corroborate this, it would be appreciated.

Also, between beta 4 and final, there was a release candidate (links are on the FoFiX wiki's Old News page). If you could test this one out also and see if the memory problem exists, it will narrow down the list of changes to investigate for the cause of the problem.

beta 4 was r960, and final was r1075. Only about 100 revisions to check... The RC falls in the middle of that at r1017.


Didn't test with the rc yet since there was no working binary release of it for Linux, and I have some issues with running from the source with the versions of dependencies included in Ubuntu (pyopengl or some other component seems to be fond of screwing up my display card/drivers when trying to run FoF, to the point where cutting the power to the machine is required to get it working), but I guess building a separate python environment is one way to spend a weekend :tongue:

I'll see what I can do.
Jack of all Trades
User avatar
BlackJack
Member
Posts: 253
Joined: December 9th, 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby BlackJack » Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:47 am

Talking about the setlist, with v3.100, on the GH3 theme(s), if it is set to "CD/List" mode, it doesn't scroll on locked songs (somewhat annoying when you just played a song in Quickplay, then go to Career).
Than != Then. It's != Its. Of != Have. Your != You're. Their != There != They're.
Image
SystemFailure
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: May 10th, 2008
Location: Canada
Reputation: 0
Contact:

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby SystemFailure » Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:35 pm

is there any way to fix the over sized multiplier, or is this a theme problem?
Blue Heaven!
User avatar
death_au
Member
Posts: 3991
Joined: December 12th, 2007
Location: Australia
Reputation: 7
Contact:

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby death_au » Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:22 pm

SystemFailure wrote:is there any way to fix the over sized multiplier, or is this a theme problem?

...probably a theme problem. What theme? And what does the multiplier look like (could you provide a screenshot)?
SystemFailure
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: May 10th, 2008
Location: Canada
Reputation: 0
Contact:

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby SystemFailure » Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:55 pm

it the rock band 2 theme, i will post a screeny later, i am just taking coding brake
COBHATECREW419
User avatar
Super_Crazy_Dude
Member
Posts: 364
Joined: June 9th, 2007
Location: Zzyzx Freeway
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby Super_Crazy_Dude » Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:43 pm

why no new updates???
Image
CHILDREN OF BODOM!!!!!!! OWNS!!!!!!
holystoneH
Member
Posts: 1250
Joined: January 15th, 2008
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby holystoneH » Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:12 am

no free time = no updates :tongue:
Uncle Fester
User avatar
slantyr
Member
Posts: 759
Joined: March 10th, 2008
Location: the great white north
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby slantyr » Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:27 am

Super_Crazy_Dude wrote:why no new updates???


fingers enormously hugh optimization, rewriting how fof handles lists of notes

once that's done the floodgates might be reopened ;)

the fact the other devs are sort of in a holding pattern,(not commiting changes) could mean that he's getting close :2thumbsup:

good things come to those who wait.
Image
Juhaz
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: December 27th, 2008
Reputation: 0

Re: FoFiX v3.1xx development thread

Postby Juhaz » Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:35 pm

Juhaz wrote:
death_au wrote:Also, between beta 4 and final, there was a release candidate (links are on the FoFiX wiki's Old News page). If you could test this one out also and see if the memory problem exists, it will narrow down the list of changes to investigate for the cause of the problem.

beta 4 was r960, and final was r1075. Only about 100 revisions to check... The RC falls in the middle of that at r1017.


Didn't test with the rc yet since there was no working binary release of it for Linux


Ah, I remembered wrong, it was beta3 that did not have a working release, not the rc.

Tested now, the rc uses more memory than b4, but not as much as final, and the jump from rc to final is larger than from beta to rc.

Return to “FoFiX”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests