warhol wrote:I can't remember the last time someone ever got warned for anything
Try about three days ago. (From me, that is) Warnings just aren't public so much anymore.
Also, on topic, Kotaku, Gizmodo, io9, Lifehacker, Rock Paper Shotgun.
warhol wrote:I can't remember the last time someone ever got warned for anything
vedicardi wrote:new kotaku layout: opinions?
it's okay imo, good conceptually
but it's clunky and slow
vedicardi wrote:new kotaku layout: opinions?
it's okay imo, good conceptually
but it's clunky and slow
tibiazak wrote:vedicardi wrote:new kotaku layout: opinions?
it's okay imo, good conceptually
but it's clunky and slow
Hate. Hate hate hate hate hate. I liked being able to just scroll down, see which articles were interesting to me, open them in new tabs and repeat until I hit the articles I saw the day before. Now, I can't do that s easily - the only way I can stand to browse the gawker sites now is by using the "classic" view - (kotaku.com/#!classic or io9.com/#!classic, etc).
Lysdestic wrote:tibiazak wrote:vedicardi wrote:new kotaku layout: opinions?
it's okay imo, good conceptually
but it's clunky and slow
Hate. Hate hate hate hate hate. I liked being able to just scroll down, see which articles were interesting to me, open them in new tabs and repeat until I hit the articles I saw the day before. Now, I can't do that s easily - the only way I can stand to browse the gawker sites now is by using the "classic" view - (kotaku.com/#!classic or io9.com/#!classic, etc).
Same here. I usually don't complain about new site layouts like most people, but I'm just not feeling the new Gawker layout.
Doesn't help that nothing displays in my installation of Opera, though that may be more from my adblocker than anything else. Haven't been bothered to check.
Uh... lamebook? I guess.
jonahmerchant12 wrote:websites that keep me preoccupied are the billboard chart webs. i check whats new, whats popular, whats hot, whats not and i keep downloading and discarding or rejecting songs. so it will keep me working for a good number of hours. for people who get bored easily or are not into music, will not find this very good.
vedicardi wrote:absolutepunk is terrible
metalsucks.com, blabbermouth, and metal underground for all things metal
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests